|Article title||SYNTHESIS OF ADAPTIVE SYNERGETIC CONTROL LAW OF AN ACTIVE AMORTIZATION SYSTEM IN EARTHMOVING MACHINERY OPERATORS SEATS|
|Authors||G.E. Veselov, A.S. Sinitsyn|
|Section||SECTION II. INTELLIGENT DECISION SUPPORT AND CONTROL|
|Month, Year||03, 2017 @en|
|Abstract||Operators of earth-moving machinery are very often exposed to low-frequency vibration. This situation is very unfavorable for a human and leads to loss of concentration, fatigue and a decrease in effectiveness of performed work. In a conventional machine of this class very often no system for wheels amortization exist, so the seat suspension is the only system that can protect the worker from shocks and vibration. Thus, the object of the study is the active suspension control system for the operator seat in earth-moving machines. The aim of the research presented in this paper is the development of algorithm that enhances the comfort level for the earth-moving machines operators. The main task solved in this paper is a synthesis of adaptive synergistic laws of active amortization system control in earth-moving machine operator seats. The proposed structure of the control system is built on the basis of a regulator synthesized by the AKAR method and a logic control unit for solenoid valves. Using the principle of integral adaptation, an integrated chain is included in the control loop, ensuring a consistent level of vibration isolation of the object, regardless of its mass. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated by the computer simulation method in the Simscape environment. As a result of the performed work the obtained regulator provides: 1) effective absorption of vibrations and shocks arising during the operation of the earth-moving machine (SEAT factor less than 0.024); 2) absence of the resonant frequency in the range from 0 to 20 Hz. Numerical modeling results have shown that characteristics of seat suspension systems are maintained even under conditions of uncertainty values insulated mass. Numerical simulation also showed that neglecting the time constants of proportional valves leads to the fact that the amortization system loses its efficiency in the frequency range above 13.6 Hz.|
|Keywords||Active suspension; nonlinear controller; adaptation; synergetics approach.|
|References||1. Thompson A.G. Optimum damping in a randomly excited non-linear suspension, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 1969, Vol. 184, pp. 169-184.
2. Karnopp D. Analytical results for optimum actively damped suspensions under random excita-tion, ASME J. Vib Acoust. Stress Reliab., Des. 1989, Vol. 111, pp. 278-283.
3. Crolla D.A. Semi-active suspension control for a full vehicle model, SAE technical paper series 911904, 1992, pp. 45-51.
4. Goodall R.M., Kortüm W. Active control in ground transportation – review of the state-of-the-art and future potential, Veh. Syst. Dyn., 1983, No. 12, pp. 225-257.
5. Hrovat D. Optimal active suspensions for 3d vehicle models, In: Proc. of the American control conference. Arizona, USA, 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 1534-1541.
6. Stein G.J. Results of investigation of an electro-pneumatic active vibration control system, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D: J Autom Eng., 1995, Vol. 209, pp. 227–234.
7. Maciejewski I. Control system design of active seat suspensions, J. Sound Vib., 2012,
Vol. 331, pp. 1291-1309.
8. Maciejewski I., Krzyzynski T. Control design of semi-active seat suspension, J. Theor. Appl. Mech., 2011, Vol. 49 (4), pp. 1151-1168.
9. Choi S.B., Lee H.K., Chang E.G. Field test results of a semi-active ER suspension system as-sociated with skyhook controller, Mechatronics, 2001, No. 11, pp. 345-353.
10. Bouazara M., Richard M.J., Rakheja S. Safety and comfort analysis of a 3-D vehicle model with optimal non-linear active seat suspension, J .Terramech., 2006, No. 43, pp. 97118.
11. Ksiazek M.A., Ziemianski D. Optimal driver seat suspension for a hybrid model of sitting human body, J. Terramech., 2012, No. 49, pp. 255-261.
12. Sun W., Li J., Zhao Y., Gao H. Vibration control for active seat suspension systems via dynamic output feedback with limited frequency characteristic, Mechatronics, 2011, No. 21, pp. 250-260.
13. Zhang H., Wang R., Wang J., Shi Y. Robust finite frequency H-inf static-outputfeedback control with application to vibration active control of structural systems, Mechatronics, 2014,
No. 24 (6), pp. 354-66.
14. Gao H, Lam J, Wang Ch. Multi-objective control of vehicle active suspension systems via load-dependent controllers, J. Sound Vib., 2006, Vol. 290, pp. 654-675.
15. Chen P-Ch, Huang A-Ch. Adaptive sliding control of non-autonomous active suspension sys-tems with time-varying loadings, J. Sound Vib., 2005 Vol. 282, pp. 1119-1135.
16. Kolesnikov A.A. Sinergeticheskaya teoriya upravleniya [Synergetic control theory]. Moscow: Energoatomizdat, 1994, 344 p.
17. Kolesnikov A.A., Veselov G.E., Popov A.N. i dr. Sinergeticheskie metody upravleniya slozhnymi sistemami: Mekhanicheskie i elektromekhanicheskie sistemy [Synergetic control methods of complex systems: Mechanical and Electromechanical systems], under the General edition of A.A. Kolesnikova. Moscow: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2013, 304 p.
18. Veselov G.E., Sinitsyn A.S. Sintez sistemy upravleniya adaptivnoy podveskoy s uchetom fizi-cheskikh ogranicheniy amortizatora [The synthesis of a control system adaptive suspen-sion taking into account the physical limitations of the shock absorber], Izvestiya YuFU. Tekhnicheskie nauki [Izvestiya SFedU. Engineering Sciences], 2015, No. 7 (168), pp. 170-184.
19. International Organization for Standarization. Earth-moving machinery – laboratory evaluation of operator seat vibration. ISO 7096, Geneva; 2000.
20. Griffin M.J. Handbook of human vibration. – London: Elsevier Academic Press; 1996.
21. Gerts E.V. Dinamika pnevmaticheskikh sistem i mashin [Dynamics of pneumatic systems and machines]. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1985, 256 p.